« FCS vs. FBS; what did we learn about the FCS teams? | Main | Catching Up: 2013 Heisman Rankings for Week 1 »

September 04, 2013

Comments

Andrew

I don't understand how Clemson fell by two and Georgia remained the same (and number 4).

Andrew

I meant that I don't understand how Clemson fell by 1.

SportsRatings

Good question Andrew. First, Georgia - even though their rating went down, every team from #1 to #6 also declined so Georgia didn't fall in ranking (they stayed #4)

Clemson's rating went up, but not by that much (a close game was expected and they won by 3 points). Meanwhile, a few other teams made bigger jumps (Baylor, Michigan) and leapfrogged the Tigers.

Basically the Clemson-Georgia result wasn't far enough away from expectations to nudge the ratings very much for those teams. If this were a Top 25-style ranking, Georgia would have fallen and Clemson would be ahead of them. These ratings aren't based on wins and losses, just performance vs. pre-season expectations.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search SportsRatings