The talk has been about the Number One spot: how it's cursed this year, and how for the first time in several decades the #1 team has lost three weeks in a row. Therefore, Oregon had better be careful! Or wait, should Auburn be careful? Or both? The "three-in-a-row" soundbyte uses the same logic that allows multiple teams to claim a national champ for a given year. In actuality, the AP #1 team did not lose three in a row (Oregon won last week, following losses by Alabama and Ohio State) but since BCS #1 Oklahoma lost, well, the sportswriters counted that for some reason. Makes a good talking point.
But with two #1 teams, there's double the chance that we'll be able to call it four in a row, just pick the poll/system you want. And neither team has an easy task: Oregon travels to USC, where the Trojans are quietly looking like a very strong team all of a sudden, and Auburn plays at Mississippi. The Tigers have had maybe one easy game all year so anything involving them should be interesting.
As for the rest of the undefeated teams, four more are in action, meaning six of the seven are putting their seasons on the line; Boise State already won on Tuesday night. What's interesting is that all of them play on the road. Missouri has the toughest assignment (at Nebraska) while Michigan State (at Iowa) and Utah (at Air Force) don't have walks in the park, either. I think we'll see at least one undefeated team lose this week, and don't be surprised if half lose, as the amount gets whittled down to around two by the end of the regular season.
Thursday Night Football: Florida State (6-1) at N.C. State (5-2)
Vegas Line/Spread: FSU by 3 1/2
Strength Power Rating Pick: FSU (55%) 32-29
Yardage Analysis Score: 31-31
Comments: The perception of Florida State and North Carolina State is that the former is a powerful team—they beat Miami 45-17 after all—and that the latter is a 5-2 fluke who just lost to East Carolina. But the Wolfpack's 5-2 record includes some decent victims, such as Georgia Tech, UCF, Cincinnati, and 44-17 over Boston College. Playing at home, the oddmakers see roughly a field goal margin and the Strength Power Rating agrees. By yardage analysis it's a straight-up draw. Using the FBS-only Strength Power Rating—which negates the effects of week one where both teams had blowouts over FCS teams—N.C. State is favored by 35/100ths of a point. Florida State has a recent history of looking good in the ACC before disappointing their fans, and North Carolina State is one of the surprise teams of the year. I predict an entertaining Thursday evening with a narrow Wolfpack win.
Final Prediction: North Carolina State 34, Florida State 31 (OT)
Trojans Playing Spoiler? #1 Oregon (7-0) at USC (5-2)
Vegas Line/Spread: Oregon by 6 1/2
Strength Power Rating Pick: Oregon (76%) 43-29
Yardage Analysis Score: Oregon 49-45
Comments: What's interesting about USC is that they've become the ultimate spoiler. Unable to win the Pac-10 even if they hadn't already lost two games, the Trojans can still crush teams' dreams. And it could happen to Oregon this weekend. Through the first few games USC looked terrible, narrowly beating Hawaii, Virginia, and Minnesota. Then they lost two games and were written off. But since then things have changed. A 48-14 blowout of Cal showed that they're still extremely dangerous. The Hawaii win looks a lot better since the Warriors are 5-2. And a last-second loss at Stanford is better than many top 25 teams would do. The Trojans are knocking on the door of the top ten in the Strength Power Rating. Let's face it: a few missed field goals and USC is 7-0, and being touted as the "real" #1 team, though ineligible for post-season play. There's no middle ground with how the Trojans are portrayed; their season is either a shambles are they are the greatest team of all time. If they beat Oregon it will be the latter again. But can anybody beat the Ducks, who are running away with the top spot in the Strength ratings, with a top ten defense to go with their #1 offense? USC's defense will be the best the Ducks have faced, but they can pass if the running game is slowed. This should be a high-scoring game, and USC should have their third narrow loss.
Final Prediction: Oregon 42, USC 39
Dixie Bowl: #3 Auburn (8-0) at Mississippi (3-4)
Vegas Line/Spread: Auburn by 7
Strength Power Rating Pick: Auburn (73%) 44-30
Yardage Analysis Score: Auburn 41-28
Comments: I don't think the Tigers are going to blow this one, which means there will be no fourth week in a row of some #1 team falling. The question is how close will the game be. Auburn has won four games by a touchdown or less, while three of Mississippi's losses have been by two touchdowns. The oddsmakers go with the 1-touchdown pattern while both my power ratings predict about a two touchdown margin. Splitting the difference, Auburn wins by 10.
Final Prediction: Auburn 34, Mississippi 24
Big Twelve North Title Game: #5 Missouri (7-0) at #15 Nebraska (6-1)
Vegas Line/Spread: Nebraska by 7 1/2
Strength Power Rating Pick: Nebraska (57%) 30-25
Yardage Analysis Score: Nebraska 37-23
Comments: Nebraska's a running team that can't pass well. Missouri's a passing team that doesn't run well. Nebraska is great against the pass and poor against the run. Missouri is average-to-mediocre against both, but is #1 in the nation in the red zone, which explains their #5 scoring defense rating. So look for Nebraska to run all over the TIgers—until they get inside the 20. Good thing for Nebraska that Taylor Martinez often scores on long runs from outside the 20. Nebraska has the #1 pass defense in the country and did well overall against Oklahoma State, but still gave up some big plays. Missouri will have to count on that if they want to stay unbeaten. Overall I think Nebraska will be better able to sustain drives, even if they have to settle for field goals, and Missouri won't be able to keep up.
Final Prediction: Nebraska 30, Missouri 21
Rose Bowl Confusion Eliminator/Creator: #6 Michigan State (8-0) at #24 Iowa (5-2)
Vegas Line/Spread: Iowa by 6 1/2
Strength Power Rating Pick: Iowa (62%) 28-23
Yardage Analysis Score: Iowa 24-21
Comments: This game either eliminates some Big Ten title confusion, or adds more to it. If Iowa wins there will be four teams with a single conference loss, with Iowa beating Michigan State beating Wisconsin beating Ohio State and Iowa. Ohio State visits Iowa next week, while the Spartans don't play the Buckeyes. A win here and MSU has a clear path to a Rose Bowl berth. But will they win? I could see this game going either way, and in a big way. Michigan State is overrated in terms of actual quality; that is, they have earned their high ranking but head-to-head they probably lose to most top 25 teams. Iowa should be able to beat them at home and perhaps expose them. But in terms of psychology it's the opposite: the Spartans are flying high with momentum and possibility, while Iowa is questioning itself after letting last week's game get away from them in the final minutes with major mistakes on special teams, defense, and offense. If they crumble it could be a lopsided Spartan win. Michigan State is a lot like Iowa last year: winning close games with a team that is clearly overachieving. I'm pretty sure they'll lose at least one game, and if it isn't here then I don't know where it will be.
Final Prediction: Iowa 34, Michigan State 17
Missing Justin Blackmon: #17 Oklahoma State (6-1) at #25 Kansas State (5-2)
Vegas Line/Spread: Oklahoma State by 5
Strength Power Rating Pick: Oklahoma State (62%) 44-38
Yardage Analysis Score: Oklahoma State 51-28
Comments: What a difference one player makes. The line has steadily fallen since receiver Justin Blackmon's DUI arrest and one-game suspension, from over a touchdown to (as of this writing) 5 points. And I think his impact could be even greater. Who knows if Brandon Weeden would have good numbers without Blackmon to throw to? 14 of his 21 TD passes have gone JB's way. If the Cowboys are a one touchdown favorite and Blackmon is worth two touchdowns a game, doesn't that put them in big trouble? Luckily for the Cowboys they also have Kendall Hunter, who rushed for 201 yards against Nebraska. And if he can do that against Nebraska then he can certainly do it against Kansas State, who has an atrocious rushing defense. The Wildcats answer with Daniel Thomas, who had some amazing efforts early but hasn't sustained it, and while Oklahoma State's defense is nothing to crow about it's better than Kansas State's. Oklahoma State still wins despite missing Blackmon.
Final Prediction: Oklahoma State 37, Kansas State 28
Mountain West Game of the Week: #7 Utah (7-0) at Air Force (5-3)
Vegas Line/Spread: Utah by 7
Strength Power Rating Pick: Utah (75%) 41-27
Yardage Analysis Score: Utah 31-27
Comments: Utah is playing well enough to make me a believer. Only 40th in our pre-season top 120, the Utes are playing at top 5 level so far. Mostly that consists of blowout out terrible teams so convincingly that it can't be ignored. Their victims so far include 1-6 UNLV, 0-7 New Mexico, 1-7 San Jose State, 4-4 Iowa State, and Wyoming and Colorado State, both 2-6. The one winning team they've defeated is 4-3 Pittsburgh, at home in overtime. So Air Force is going to be the first tough team they've faced on the road, and we'll find out whether the Pitt game was a fluke or not. The Utes could be one of those teams that can blow out poor teams but struggles with a strong team; or else the Pitt performance was a major underperformance. The key to this game is rushing defense, both Utah's and Air Force's. The Utes are decent against the run, which is crucial against the Falcon triple-option. Meanwhile Air Force's rushing D is terrible, and Utah will capitalize. Their main passing weapons may struggle againt the Falcons, who really do have a great pass defense. Utah's next three games—Air Force, TCU, and Notre Dame—are critical and I have a feeling they'll lose two of them, most likely the first two. Utah can prove itself this weekend, but I'm picking the upset in the Utes first road test; Air Force has lost two in a row and is setting a classic trap as Utah could be looking ahead to TCU.
Final Prediction: Air Force 27, Utah 26
Mountain West Snoozefest of the Week: #4 TCU (8-0) at UNLV (1-6)
Vegas Line/Spread: TCU by 35
Strength Power Rating Pick: TCU (98.95%) 45-6
Yardage Analysis Score: TCU 43-0
Comments: Comparing TCU and UNLV's game performances, the Strength Power Rating finds no wins for UNLV out of 56 cross-comparisons. That is, UNLV's best game is worse than TCU's worst game. Splitting out offensive and defensive performances, creating 3,136 matchups, it does find 33 permutations were UNLV triumphs, hence the roughly 1% chance of winning granted to the Rebels. The way the Horned Frogs have been playing lately on defense, though (0, 0, 3, and 7 points yielded) I'm not sure I would give them even that.
Final Prediction: TCU 41, UNLV 0
5-2 Matchup of the Week: East Carolina (5-2) at Central Florida (5-2)
Vegas Line/Spread: UCF by 7 1/2
Strength Power Rating Pick: UCF (77%) 36-24
Yardage Analysis Score: UCF 29-16
Comments: There are scads of 2-loss teams out there, but these are the only two who play each other. Central Florida has lost to 5-2 Kansas State and 5-2 North Carolina State, while East Carolina beat N.C. State and 5-2 Southern Miss while losing to 6-2 Virginia Tech. So these teams are the nexus of all 2-loss teams, and one has to fall. That will probably be East Carolina. UCF has been very consistent and was competitive in its two losses. The Pirates have pulled off some upsets but were beaten down 42-17 and 49-27. UCF should win this one at home.
Final Prediction: Central Florida 35, East Carolina 17
Wetzel's bias ruins potentially informative BCS article, book
It would be nice to see an in-depth article about the computer ratings used in the BCS. Most people are very curious as to how they work, and since each computer rating is as important as roughly 14 pollsters, it would give some insight into what factors rank one team ahead of another. This is something that most college football fans know very little about. A large organization like Yahoo! Sports would be capable of doing a quality, comprehensive job with such an article.
They tried, but of course since Dan Wetzel was involved, what little insight we get is lost in the haze of vitriol directed at the BCS, and indirectly at the computer ratings and the men who created them. 'Death to the BCS: Nonsense Rules is one long, anti-BCS rant, pretty much the same as everything Wetzel writes on the subject, interspersed with interesting snapshots of the people who created several of the computer rating systems.
A further look reveals that the article is an excerpt from a full-length book, one which I can't imagine anyone in their right mind would read. The few who love the BCS (is there anyone?) wouldn't want to read it; the majority who hate the BCS already know why they hate it. What possible insight is there in a book whose objective is to slam the BCS?
The excerpted article shows how painful a read the book must be. Every time an objective, interesting fact tries to get in the way, the authors storm in with opinion and more BCS denigration. Along the way there are a few bizarre moments:
A few years ago Wetzel showed off his 16-team playoff brackets, and the 2nd round had something very telling: an expected matchup between Oklahoma and Texas Tech. Of course, the teams had played just weeks earlier, resulting in a 65-21 Oklahoma win. So Texas Tech gets a second chance? And if they win by a point, that's ok?
It's results like that which make a playoff system potentially worse—yes, even worse—than the BCS itself. What Wetzel is saying by presenting that matchup with a straight face is: the regular season does not matter at all. A 44 point win? Thrown in the trash heap. Play it again.
A well-constructed playoff would be great. But what are the odds that we'll get that? When even professional BCS-haters like Wetzel come up with horrifically stupid systems to replace it, imagine what the real powers that be will construct. And don't say making a playoff system is easy and obvious. So is making a BCS system, and look how they messed that up. Given a very simple job—determine the top two teams—they ignored the obvious: use the AP and Coaches poll only, like we'd been doing for decades. Instead they made a convoluted system with all sorts of extraneous variables, and got weird results that didn't match what everyone wanted: the top two teams in the polls.
They tweaked the system by simplifying it, and today's formula is the best one so far (which doesn't say much). The next logical step would be to get rid of the computers except in case of a tie. It's taken them 12 years and they aren't even at the obvious place they should have been in 1998. How long will it take them to whip a playoff system into shape?
Hate it, slam it, wish it would go away, but the BCS is what we've got right now, and I and many others would like to read interesting, informative, unbiased, and non-vitriolic articles about how the system works. We'll have to wait for those articles, though, because they aren't being written. Instead we get full-length books that preach to the choir about hating the BCS. It's a shame, because reading between the glut of bias there are some intriguing moments even in the short article. The reader is doomed, however, to only getting one viewpoint on the subject, one that colors everything written within.
Reblog (0) |