Pittsburgh had one of the nation's best teams last year, and started this year 11-1 before an 8-game skid knocked them well out of the top 25—or top 100—and dug for the Panthers an 0-7 start to the Big East season.
But all of a sudden the Panthers are playing well again. They've won three in a row, beating Georgetown 72-60 on Saturday and following that up with a road win over West Virginia on Monday, 72-66.
What does this mean? Pitt's sudden resurgence over a span of just a few games is similar to what we saw happen with Florida State and Notre Dame recently: decent teams, down on their luck and forgotten, suddenly have a rash of big wins to crawl out from their NIT fate (or worse) and look like NCAA tournament contenders again.
FSU was 9-6 before their surge; the Seminoles famously upset North Carolina, winning by 33 points, then beat Duke in Cameron. Notre Dame was 11-8 but has won three straight including an upset of then-#1 Syracuse.
But neither team had fallen as far as Pitt, both from last year's standpoint and in terms of losing streaks this year. The Panthers, at their January 21st nadir, were #209 in the Zeitgeist rankings, having fallen from #12 where they stood when 11-1 a month earlier.
Pitt's Strength rating—#48 even when 11-1—portended that the Big East wouldn't be kind to them. Even their Success rating wasn't impressed with their start against a weak schedule; they ranked just #51 at their December peak. This gave them a Combined ranking of #50, hardly comparable to last year's #1 NCAA seed team.
But the Panthers fell harder than just about anyone expected. Starting with a loss to Wagner, things spiraled downward and the Panthers were 11-9 on January 21st, #83 in Strength, #125 in Success, and #97 Combined.
Just as Pitt's poor Strength rating portended their fall, it was actually a few losses ago that things started to turn around. The 62-39 home loss to Rutgers (game 17) was the absolute bottom for the team, and since then they've played much better. The following two games—road losses to Marquette by 5 and Syracuse by 8—were two of their best games since early in the season.
And after the loss to Louisville in game 20, they've come back in a big way. It's enough to show in their full-season power ratings: they are now up to #64 in Strength, #73 in Success, and #69 Combined, while in the heavily-weighted-to-recent-games Zeitgeist ranking they've rocketed from #209 to #62.
Over the last six games, they rank #24 in Strength. (Florida State, for comparison, is #6, and Notre Dame #31). It's not quite #1 seed worthy, but playing like a top 25 team—even for a small stretch—is noteworthy for this team.
So what happened? Tray Woodall's return is important, as he scored 24 against West Virginia and 17 against Providence, but he wasn't playing long before their skid and returned only after the started playing well. And it seems that a different player has stepped up—whether it be Woodall, Ashton Gibbs or Nasir Robinson—in their recent games.
It might just have been the loss to Rutgers that lit a fire under the team. It's easy to look back and retroactively pick a "moment" when things changed, even if there's no real reason. But if we had to guess, that would be the change, along with the return of starter Woodall, that sparked the team.
That, as well as lulling their opponents into overconfidence. That's the one good thing that an 8-game skid will do for you.
The Panthers have a long way to go for an NCAA berth. At 67% in RealWins, they need about seven more wins to be a "lock" for the tournament. With 8 games left plus the Big East tournament, that's a tall order. But to be a bubble team they only need a handful of wins—maybe just 4 more. Ken Pomeroy projects just that, with an 18-13 finish, which would mean that the Big East tourney is where they'll have to prove themselves.
Unless they can get a few more big upsets; finishing with an even conference record would leave a lot less to chance. That would be quite a remarkable comeback for a team that most had written off just a few weeks ago.