The Boston Celtics lead the Cleveland Cavaliers 2-0 after two games at the Garden. Though this was expected, there was some fear among Boston fans that Cleveland and LeBron James would be emboldened by Atlanta's performance in taking their series with the Celtics to seven games. So far, that hasn't happened, but did Boston do everything it had to—aside from winning—in the first two games? And what does it point to for the rest of the series?
Boston basically had to accomplish two things in the first home stretch to lay the foundation for certain victory in the series.
1) Stop LeBron James
On this they get an A+. Whatever they've done, it's worked like a charm: James is 8 of 42 shooting for the series so far, scoring just 12 in the first game and 21 in the second, while committing a total of 17 turnovers. Good defense? Certainly. But there's more.
James shot just 2 of 18 the first game. Some of that has to be a fluke, an imperfect storm of bad luck for LeBron. But he followed it up by shooting 6 of 24 the next game. Taken together, that's a little too much to attribute to even bad luck and good defense combined. I think the answer is the Celtics have gotten inside his head, and hurt his confidence.
Think about James' age, relative to say, Kevin Garnett. James is 23, Garnett will be 33 in about a week. Flash back ten years: James is 13, a budding star even before high school. But Garnett is 22, already in the NBA for several seasons, and already a superstar. It's almost a certainty that James idolized Garnett at this point. He'd later become the first high school basketball player to make the Sports Illustrated cover since Garnett.
Now, return to the present. Garnett has been know to talk trash to players. He's been talking to James a lot during breaks. Is this having an effect on James? We tend to think of elite athletes as machines, impervious to psychological manipulation, but when a former idol tells you that you ain't shit, you're gonna miss all your shots....especially on the road, and you're still just 23 years old? It could be a key reason that LeBron hasn't been LeBron so far. Part of his play is due to the Celtics' defense, but if he were at his best, he wouldn't be playing like a benchwarmer. And that part of the equation won't be the same in Cleveland, where he has the emotional support of thousands of fans and a determination to win for them.
2) Dominate the home games
On this point, Boston didn't do quite as well. Though the 2nd game was a blowout, the first game was actually competitive.
Boston wanted to completely dominate both games, giving the series a sense of inevitability. Atlanta was able to hang on in their series by winning close games at home, but in Boston they couldn't do anything right. Since Boston had the majority of games at home, it ultimately didn't matter if Atlanta won at their own house.
And this is what Boston wanted to say to Cleveland: there's no chance of you winning at the Garden. In order to win the series, Cleveland has to win at least one game at Boston. Shutting this door effectively shuts the series down. With no hope of winning for the Cavaliers, the games at Cleveland become easier for the Celtics. After all, if there's no chance to win the series, why (subconsciously) play your hardest at home? Take away hope, and you take away a lot of intangibles, and Boston could score some wins on the road and end the series sooner.
The first game was portrayed as a Boston defensive seminar on how to stop LeBron James. But at the same time, it opened up questions. If Cleveland can stay this close to Boston, at Boston, while James is shooting 2 of 18, what happens when James has an inevitable good game? Answer: They should be able to win easily at Cleveland, and maybe even take one away on the road. Far from making a statement, game 1 actually has to be very encouraging for the Cavaliers for their chances in the series, even being down 2-0.
From here
But first, of course, LeBron James has to have a good game in game 3, and the Cavs have to win. If they fall short in either category, the series is likely over. They need a win, of course, to not be down 3-0 and to establish that the home games are theirs. And James needs a good game as well, otherwise he'll start to believe he can't play Boston anywhere. The Cavs can't afford him to get this mindset.
Two Cavalier wins at home would even the series and put the onus on Boston again to defend their home court. With the weakness Boston showed in game one, and with James over being psyched out, the games in the Garden could be very competitive.
If Boston wins one of two in Cleveland, James will need to be at his very best for the Cavs to have a chance in the series. I expect James to rebound in a big way tonight, and lead the Cavs to victory. Game four is more up in the air.
Ultimately, Boston only needs to win at home. With their narrow victory in game one, they've left the door open for Cleveland to steal one; by taking one in Cleveland, and/or continuing their shutdown of James, they can quickly close the door.